Skip nav to main content.
BLOG   »

Case Study: Better Competition

  • May 22, 2018
Case Study: Better Competition

The Formulation Request

A few years ago,a customer contacted BPI Labs and indicated interest in a domestically made diaper rash cream, also known as a barrier cream. The customer was presently purchasing a variety of barrier cream brands, and most were sourced from Asia.  BPI will often ask clients to send a sample product with roughly the same specifications as the kind of product they would like developed so that the laboratory can replicate a customer’s preferred product qualities and reduce development time. In this case, BPI’s client submitted a product developed by an Asian company for BPI’s review.

 

The Problem

After studying the sample our customer sent to us, BPI learned that the petrolatum contained in this sample barrier cream could not be purchased domestically for less than the finished Asian sourced product.  This would mean that BPI Labs’ cost for just a single ingredient found commonly in barrier creams would cost more than the foreign sourced product even after it was packaged in tubes and shipped to America.  But, this is where the story becomes interesting.


But, this is where the story becomes interesting.


These barrier cream formulations are a low-technology composition containing mostly petrolatum with dispersed zinc oxide.  The zinc oxide in barrier creams is the active ingredient responsible for the product’s efficacy in its application to the body.  The petrolatum is used primarily for the suspension and delivery of the active ingredient, and incidentally causes the product to have similar performance characteristics with a petroleum jelly.  As an anecdote, the amount of zinc contained within the sample barrier cream we were given was not indicated on the outside of the packaging of the current supplier’s product, despite the barrier cream being an over-the-counter drug.

The Solution

Knowing petrolatum wouldn’t be a usable ingredient, BPI Labs turned to using a combination of cosmetic technologies to substitute the expensive petrolatum with water.  This had the effect of reducing the cost of our barrier cream formulation to something competitive with foreign sourced diaper rash creams, and we were able to do this while increasing the amount of active ingredient, zinc oxide, within the formulation to levels higher than the foreign sourced product. In the end, our formulation had none of the greasy and messy tactile feel consistent with petrolatum based products, and we were able to improve the efficacy of our formulation above that of the foreign competitors.

Conclusion: BPI Labs Competes on Cosmetic Technology

When originally looking only for a domestic supplier our customer also received a superior performing product that was competitively priced.  The consumer response, we learned from our customer, was overwhelmingly positive when compared with the Asian sourced products, and our customer has requested no changes or updates to the formula since it’s approval.


Keep Learning

Here are some related guides and posts that you might enjoy next.

Hair Care Manufacturing

Case Study: Partnership

September 15, 2018 | admin-labs

A customer with a failing manufacturing relationship, stock outages, and a life threatening illness comes to BPI for help.

Read More
private label skincare

Case Study: Difficult Transitions

May 21, 2018 | admin-labs

BPI’s clients commonly come from another distressed manufacturing relationship. See how we make it smooth.

Read More

We Don’t Make Epinephrine!

October 26, 2017 | Mike Shirley

We don't make ANY pharmaceutical products, either.

Read More

Curious About The Details?

Download a copy of our process infographic to see all the steps of your product development.

Back to BPI DOWNLOAD INFOGRAPHIC